Thursday, May 5, 2011

Painted Female Gentilia

India had said twice about U.S. on the likely presence of Osama in Islamabad

NEW DELHI: It turns out that Indian agencies had twice warned their U.S. counterparts the presence of al-Qaida, Osama bin Laden in a populated and highly urbanized area, not far from Islamabad - once in mid-2007 and again in early 2008 when it specifically mentions the likely presence cantonment area. On both occasions, the Americans, or Indian intelligence was not serious, or maybe they were too busy working on their own inputs on the whereabouts of Osama.

The first time that Indian security agencies gave this information to U.S. authorities was in the middle 2007, shortly after the Taliban Peshawar meeting, attended Osamas No. 2, Ayman al-Zawahiri. According to information gathered by Indian intelligence agents, the meeting was also attended by top leaders of the Haqqani network and at least two officers of the ISI.

Days after the meeting, Zawahiri visited Islamabad, according to information available with the Indian authorities and this formed the basis of inputs Indias first in the U.S. on the hiding place of Osama. "The urgency with which Zawahiri visited Islamabad or in the area of \u200b\u200bthe environment suggested he was there with a purpose. Zawahiri spoke of visiting Islamabad and also said he believed that Osama can not be hidden in caves, but in a highly urbanized area somewhere near Islamabad. Of course, no one had seen and was a conclusion which was based on the basis of the information we have, "said a top intelligence official involved in the processing of information.

the next six months, agents of India from time to time he got the information about the movement of confidants Osamas in the region. The final entry passes following U.S. agencies and officials from India was in the early 2008, when he made specific mention of his illness and its possible presence in a cantonment area. "This time we mentioned specifically about your presence in a cantonment area. It was because we had definite information that their movement was restricted by their disease and would have been impossible for him to go to a regular hospital. We told the Americans that only in a cantonment area could be addressed by Pakistan's ISI or other benefactors, "said the official.

While the U.S. officially maintained that the Pakistani authorities were not informed about the operation until the helicopter Americans left the airspace of Pakistan, India the security officials to take this with a pinch of salt. "The Americans could have that capability, but we have no reason to rule that the Pakistanis decided to surrender because he was proving to be too much of a liability for them without operating profit," said an official.

This has also raised questions about the whereabouts of Zawahiri, now widely recognized as the supreme leader of al-Qaida. In the past, he has been reported to be hiding somewhere in the border area between Afghanistan and Pakistan.


Can You Use Other Wax In A Scentsy Warmer

reasons for and against Bin Laden dead show



President Barack Obama announced he would not submit photos that show Osama bin Laden with a bullet hole in his head, sparking a heated debate in the U.S. about whether they should be shown to the public.

U.S.
said he threw the corpse of Bin Laden to the ocean because it would have been difficult to get a country to accept him in time. There has been speculation about the desire to avoid the possible burial place became a shrine.

Related Content
Government officials say they have irrefutable proof of their identity. Indicate that the DNA of the al-Qaeda leader agrees on a "virtual 100%" with the DNA of their relatives.

But attention has focused on the existence of photographs taken after the death of Bin Laden. The White House would have a photo of al-Qaeda leader with a large wound between the eyes as well as other of his body and the funeral at sea.

In an interview with CBS, Obama said he would not release the photos, ensuring that the "very graphic images" could inciting violence and become instruments of propaganda.
"Error presidential"
Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, had suggested a day earlier in an interview that the photos would be made public eventually, but gave no dates.


"The whole point of sending our soldiers, instead of making an air raid was to obtain irrefutable proof of the death of Bin Laden"


Lindsey Graham Republican Senator.

"Obviously the government has been talking about how to make this the best way, but I do not think there's any doubt that eventually a picture will be presented to the public, "Panetta said before the White House to disavow his statement.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said the presidential decision not to show the photos was a mistake that "extends this debate unnecessarily."

"The whole point of sending our soldiers, instead of making an air raid was to obtain irrefutable proof of the death of Bin Laden, "said Graham.

" I know that Bin Laden is dead, but the best way to defend and protect our interests eign is to prove that fact to the world. "

Freedom of Information


is possible that someone presents a legal challenge to the decision of the White House under the Freedom Information, a case that would likely according to some lawyers polled by the BBC correspondent in Washington, Tom Geoghegan.

The U.S. government has been at that point before. In July 2003 he was criticized for submit photos of the bodies of the sons of deposed Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, Uday and Qusay to prove that the U.S. forces had killed.

"But the decision was undoubtedly a success that managed to silence most conspiracy theories," says our correspondent.
"presenting risks outweigh the benefits. The conspiracy theorists around the world will say that the photos are retouched anyway, and there is a real risk that his presentation would serve only to inflame public opinion in Middle East "
Geoghegan explains that before the president announced his decision, the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, were advising him not to reveal the pictures by the fear that give the impression that Washington was delighted with the death of Bin Laden and unleashed reprisals on the Arab world.

One person who has seen the photos, Republican Mike Rogers, chief of the Intelligence Committee of the House of Representatives, said the publication of the images may make the job of U.S. troops in Iraq or Afghanistan "more difficult than it already is."

"presenting risks outweigh the benefits. The conspiracy theorists around the world will say that the photos are retouched anyway, and there is a real risk that his presentation would serve only to inflame public opinion in the Middle East. "

" Imagine what the American people would react if al-Qaeda kills one of our soldiers or a military leader and put those photos online, "said Rogers stating that" Osama bin Laden is not a trophy. "violent Self


Still others claim that there is a principle at stake: to show the body of Bin Laden could compromise the way he has behaved so far U.S. . and that the picture would become a dirty image, defining the story of the death of Bin Laden.

The New Yorker magazine ClicPhillip Gourevitch asks, "Have we learned something of the past decade about the overwhelming power of the raw images of violence and polarize a defining moment in history?".

"The pictures of the Iraqi prison of Abu Ghraib were the non-paper of an unofficial policy that was supposed to be kept secret, but we learned that the picture of violence that one always deals in large As a self-portrait. "

"By getting rid of Bin Laden, Obama has taken a major step to leave that era behind us. Do we want a picture of bin Laden's skull pierced to eclipse that time? "asked the columnist Gourevitch.

projected a professional operation without fear and was done without arrogance or gloating, considers Gourevitch, and marked a departure from the rhetoric of" we will draw the cache "of government Bush.

"Bin Laden's death enables us to move on, but not if that page is printed with an official photograph of the trophy with his head smashed.